HOW GOOD IS YOUR DOCTOR?
Do you think you know how good your physician is? Unfortunately
you don’t, and no one else really knows for sure, either.
It’s hard to believe but no physician can honestly tell you,
themselves or anyone else whether they are excellent, good or merely
mediocre at what they do. Why? Because American physicians have
no objective performance measurements to assess their clinical competency.
The United States has a patchwork system for protecting the public
from poor quality healthcare that is largely uncoordinated and ineffective
and the medical community has consistently fought any attempt at
objective performance measurement.1
Rather, professional medicine uses highly subjective methods such
as peer opinion, referral rates or self-evaluation of anecdotal
incidents to determine “how good” a physician really
is at his or her profession. All of these methods, of course, lack
the unbiased truthfulness of measured data. Unfortunately, the only
valid and reliable data most physicians received are their monthly
financial billing summaries.2
Most physicians assume, however, that they practice high-quality,
consistent medicine using the standards and guidelines that they
were taught during their schooling and residency. This assumption
implies that there is no compelling reason to measure care that
is presumed to be excellent.3 Physicians in our healthcare
industry continue to follow this assumption, even without objective
measurement information to support their assumptions. It is time
for physicians to assume accountability for the objective measurement
of their own performance.
Whenever physician performance measurement has been undertaken
in this country, however, the results are shocking. “Mediocre”
is sometimes the best word one can use to describe what’s
revealed:
- According to a recent Rand study, even patients with the best
available insurance received the appropriate, recommended care
from their physicians only 55 percent of the time!4
- In a study of beta-blocker administration, our nation’s
cardiologists prescribed the lifesaving medication for only 52
percent of eligible heart attack patients.5
- A 2004 study found that physicians in teaching hospitals washed
their hands appropriately only 57% of the time.6
The list can go on and on. Sadly, these performance results reflect
the standard of care practiced in American medicine today. Our healthcare
system has ignored quality measurement long enough; our physicians
have ignored the measurement issue long enough.
Our health system must assume accountability for the objective
measurement of its physicians performance. Relying on anecdotal
information or “gut feeling” is not enough anymore.
The old standard of accountability is too subjective and inaccurate
to meet the demands of today’s patient safety and quality
environment.7
Doctors have long enjoyed autonomy in their practices, but the
price for that autonomy should be accountability.8 In
short, it’s just not possible to be accountable without performance
measurement.
Return to Top
Last update on: 10/2/06
|